Trade In Cart
0|$0.00
> Classic Systems  
RCA Studio 2
 

RCA Studio 2

RCA Studio II: RCA's Bold but Short-Lived Attempt at Console Gaming

Released in 1977, the RCA Studio II was an early home video game console that attempted to bring the growing video game market into the living room. Developed by RCA (Radio Corporation of America), it was notable for being one of the first microprocessor-based consoles. The Studio II used color graphics and came with a set of built-in games that used the console's hardware to create basic, blocky visuals.

One of the unique features of the Studio II was its keyboard-style controller, which lacked the traditional joystick or paddle setup that was popular in other consoles of the time. The console's game library was rather limited, with only around 20 titles, mostly consisting of simple arcade-style games like "Space War" and "Bowling". These games were basic, using monochrome graphics on a black-and-white display, and the console's overall graphical capabilities were modest, even by the standards of the era.

Despite its technical innovations and attempt to capitalize on the growing popularity of home consoles, the RCA Studio II was quickly overshadowed by more successful systems, such as the Atari 2600. Its lack of appeal to the broader gaming market, a small library of games, and limited graphical capabilities led to its short lifespan, ultimately making it a footnote in the early history of home gaming systems. Nonetheless, it represents one of the first attempts to bring video games into the mainstream and is a nostalgic piece of gaming history for collectors.


RCA executives had been kicking themselves ever since they let Ralph Baer's system slip through their fingers and into the hands of Magnavox. Because of this, RCA was busy trying to catch up with the video game console explosion of the late seventies.

The RCA Studio II was styled very much after the Pong units of the time, with one glaring exception; it had a cartridge port similar to the Fairchild Channel F. Another less important difference was that the Studio II had numeric keypads for controllers instead of the paddles that were standard among the Pong games of the era.

Both the RCA Studio II and Fairchild Channel F were doomed to failure because of the looming presence of the Second Generation Atari VCS/2600 on the horizon.



RCA Studio II Review: An Early Console That Didn't Quite Hit the Mark

Released in 1977, the RCA Studio II was an ambitious attempt by RCA to break into the growing home video game market. As one of the first consoles to use a microprocessor, it represented an early step toward more sophisticated gaming systems. However, despite its technical innovations, the Studio II struggled to make an impact, quickly becoming overshadowed by more successful consoles like the Atari 2600. With its limited game library, simple graphics, and an unusual control scheme, the RCA Studio II ultimately fell short of becoming a gaming sensation.

Design & Setup

The RCA Studio II had a unique design for its time. The console itself was compact, with a keyboard-style controller that replaced the traditional joysticks or paddles seen in other systems. While this offered something different, the controller felt awkward and less intuitive than the more familiar setups that players were used to. The keyboard layout wasn't ideal for gaming, and it made the Studio II feel more like a novelty item rather than a functional gaming device.

The system was designed for use with a black-and-white television, which significantly limited its visual appeal compared to the color graphics available on other consoles. Even for 1977, the lack of color graphics made the Studio II feel outdated almost immediately after its release.

Game Library & Performance

The RCA Studio II had a small library of games, with only about 20 titles available. These games were basic, arcade-style experiences such as "Bowling", "Space War", and "Handball". The games used very simple monochrome graphics, making them visually unremarkable even by the standards of the time. While the games themselves were somewhat fun in short bursts, they lacked the depth and variety needed to keep players engaged long-term.

For the most part, the gameplay was quite basic and repetitive. There wasn't much innovation in terms of game mechanics or graphics, and the lack of color left the system feeling outdated compared to rivals like the Atari 2600, which was released the same year and offered more engaging graphics and a larger selection of games.

Limitations & Drawbacks

  • Limited Game Library: The small selection of games was one of the Studio II's biggest drawbacks. With only around 20 titles, and many of them simple clones of each other, the system lacked the variety that would make it appealing for long-term play.

  • Monochrome Graphics: The Studio II displayed monochrome graphics, which was a major issue in an era when color consoles were becoming the norm. Even though the system's technology was advanced for its time, the lack of color made the games feel primitive.

  • Awkward Controller: The keyboard-style controller was unconventional and made gameplay feel less fluid compared to the joystick or paddle controllers of its competitors. This unique design didn't catch on and was one of the main reasons the system felt less enjoyable to use.

  • Short Lifespan: With the arrival of more advanced consoles like the Atari 2600, the RCA Studio II quickly faded into obscurity. Its failure to gain a solid foothold in the market led to a short lifespan, and it was discontinued just a few years after its release.

Final Verdict

The RCA Studio II had some early technical promise, being one of the first consoles to use a microprocessor, but it was ultimately outdated before it even had a chance to succeed. Its lack of color graphics, limited game selection, and awkward controller held it back, while the release of more powerful systems like the Atari 2600 quickly made it irrelevant.

While it can be seen as an important step in gaming history-paving the way for future consoles-it didn't make a lasting impact. The RCA Studio II is remembered today more for its historical significance than for its actual performance as a gaming system. It remains a curiosity for collectors and retro gaming enthusiasts, but its place in the market was brief and unsuccessful.

Score: 3/10

? A pioneering effort in early console gaming, but the lack of color graphics, limited game library, and clumsy controls ultimately made it a footnote in gaming history.

Would you like to learn more about other early gaming systems from this era or dive into how consoles like the Atari 2600 overshadowed the Studio II?


JT August  starsabre@att.net  on Sunday, March 5, 2000 at 20:37:47 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The RCA Studio II failure was more self induced than to blame on Atari.  The system had many limitations that made it ineffective as a competitor against Atari.  The numeric keypad controllers were key.  They were clumsy and awkard to use.  Also, RCA had its own baggage that hindered the system.  Atari was still struggling with Distribution, while the Studio II was simply added to the well established RCA distribution flow. Atari recognized that to gain market share, they had to advertise aggressively, and did so.  RCA did very little advertising, thinking that the unit's presence in RCA retailers would be pretty much sufficient.  Atari was aggresively developing games, and had over 20 carts by the first Christmas, whereas RCA ultimately developed only seven total, and none of the games were particularly impressive. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------